|
Welcome to rascott.com
This is a
personal site that reflects my interests in news,
current affairs, aviation and travel.
Home Up
Come fly
with me
Photo Albums
My photographs are now stored on Picasa.
Please use
this link to see my list of photo albums.
Some
Useful links:
Information:
World Time
Clock
Exchange Rates
Journalism:
ForeignPolicy
Nationsonline.org
Project Syndicate
Amnesty International
Reporters w/o borders
The Guardian
BBC World News
CNN Asia
Bangkok Post
Daylife.com - news
Gulf News
Arabian Business
World News
WSJ - Asia
SCMP
Good causes:
Sister
Joan - Bangkok
Regional Info:
BKK Magazine
HK Magazine
In
Singapore Magazine
TimeOut Dubai
Back in the UK:
Newton Ferrers
Bournville News
And for fun:
EarthCam
History
BBC Archive
National Media
Museum
The British Library
Imperial War Museum
There are many other links on my
AOB blog page.
| |
Thai holiday - Yes or No
24 June 2014
Over the next few months you will see a
concerted effort by Thailand’s government and tourism authorities to encourage
tourists to return to the country.
Should you go? The simple answer is “No”.
Saying “no” to Thailand is the most effective way of delivering a message to the
generals that taking freedom away from people is simply not acceptable in the
21st century. Imagine if the 25million tourists who come to Thailand each year
chose to spend their vacation time and vacation money somewhere else. The Thai
junta, who are once again, in control of the nation would get a very loud
message.
This of course will not happen. There are at least a few million Chinese who
will still visit as they see nothing different from their own country. There are
plenty of Russians who are now arriving in large enough numbers that Pattaya and
Phuket have Russian signage.
And there will be many who think that this is Thailand at its most peaceful.
Just remember that the maid who cleans your room no longer has the right to
express her views unless of course they are in praise of the new regime.
Visitors who value freedom of speech, liberty and the right to choose who our
leaders are may want to look to other destinations..
It is reasonable to argue that the options in SE Asia are not especially
attractive. But at least you know what you are getting. It is the hyprocrisy of
the coup leaders and their supporters that makes the country so unattractive at
this time.
The junta and their supporters, many of whom are now forming an online
propaganda army, will say that this is a Thai affair; that Thai politics is not
the business of foreigners. That foreigners should not get involved. The
generals are taking refuge behind a promoted and rabid nationalism. They are
also ignoring the dependence of the nation on foreign tourism and foreign
investment.
So-called populist policies that were previously denounced as spendthrift and
corrupt and that were blocked by the courts and “independent agencies” are now
being unashamedly promoted. But without the checks and balances that kept these
projects under scrutiny in the first place.
“Be happy” campaigns that urge the population to forget the coup and its
repression are all the rage.
Every day the junta summons a list of people to present themselves to army
headquarters. They can expect detention; in some case they can expect
prosecution in military courts.
The junta is emphasizing the role of the monarchy in its propaganda and has
expanded its use of lese majeste to restrict opposition to the coup. 65 million
people are effectively discouraged from discussing perhaps the most important
issue in their near future; what will happen to their nation on the death of
Rama IX.
Law is now determined by the dictatorship, and enforced through military courts.
Censorship and the monitoring of the population is expanded to unprecedented
levels.
Meanwhile, the dictatorship expands the number of people “called in,” detained
and arrested and imprisoned for opposing the regime, its laws and its ideology.
Yes the curfew has been lifted; but martial law remains. This includes the use
of military court martials without the right of appeal. Political protests and
criticism of the takeover remain banned by the junta which appears excessively
sensitive to criticism since the coup, suggesting that crackdowns on freedom of
expression and association will continue.
The junta has announced that a temporary constitution will be drafted and an
interim government installed in about three months. This will be an appointed
government working for the military. Elections are a long way off in the future.
At least a year. Maybe longer as the junta insists that peace and reforms must
first be achieved.
That election will be under a very different constitution. The 2007 constitution
was enacted by the army after their 2006 coup. That election still saw Thaksin
Shinawatra backed parties win elections in 2008, 2013 and 2014. That will not
happen under a new constitution.
Because of the harsh crackdown on political leaders and journalists, protests
against the military command are limited and cautious - they have included flash
mob techniques, quick pop-up protests which end before authorities arrive to
conduct arrests, though arrests have still occurred. There is much wider use of
plain-clothed policing.
After a lull it is very possible that protests could grow, and if the military
fails to exercise restraint in responding, serious abuses could occur in the
context of arrests and detention.
One of the defences uses by pro-coup supporters is that there were human rights
abuses by the government of former PM Thaksin Shinawatra. There were; and also
during the military takeover in 2006 and during the Abhisit government that came
into power afterwards. There were also human rights issues during Yingluck
Shinawatra's government. But the problems of the past do not justify the present
action.
It is clear that the military has not seized power as a neutral intermediary
between rival Yellow Shirt and Red Shirt groups. The military's vision for
restoration of civilian rule appears aligned with the Suthep led yellow shirt
demands against the former Yingluck government.
There is, at the very least, an alignment of interests between the military and
'anti-government' protestors who, before the coup, sought to bring down the
Yingluck government.
What the military has not grasped is that being anti-coup does not necessarily
equate with being pro-Thaksin. And there are many members of the red shirt
aligned UDD who have distanced themselves from Thaksin. Being anti-coup means
being pro freedom of speech; freedom of assembly; freedom of debate; freedom to
vote; freedom to protest.
The junta denies that its happiness campaign is a stunt. That the nation is not
going to be changed by propaganda, free movies and military junta members
leading sing-alongs with school children. The nation will be changed by strong
democratic institutions and a vibrant economy, precisely the things that the
military junta damaged when they seized power last month.
Meanwhile the junta marches along.
|