rascott.com                                                                                 news, views and an occasional blog


Welcome to rascott.com
This is a personal site that reflects my interests in news,
current affairs, aviation and travel.

email me: robert@rascott.com

Home
Up

Now In Dubai:
Scott Consulting

Photo Albums
My photographs have been moved off this site and are now stored on Picasa. They were simply taking up too much space on my web host.
Please use
this link to see my list of photo albums.

Some Useful links:
Information:
World Time Clock
Exchange Rates

Journalism:
ForeignPolicy

Nationsonline.org
Project Syndicate
Amnesty International
Reporters w/o borders

The Guardian
BBC World News
CNN Asia
Bangkok Post

Daylife.com - news

Gulf News
Arabian Business
World News
WSJ - Asia
SCMP
Good causes:

Sister Joan - Bangkok

Regional Info:

BKK Magazine
HK Magazine
In Singapore Magazine
TimeOut Dubai
Back in the UK:
Newton Ferrers

And for fun:
Lin Ping live panda tv

EarthCam
History

BBC Archive

National Media Museum
The British Library
Imperial War Museum

There are many other links on my AOB blog page.


Dubai to repay Abu Dhabi debt in 2014

30 September 2013 The EIU

Dubai, which needs to repay US$20bn to three Abu Dhabi entities next year, will meet its obligations and is not negotiating to refinance its debt, according to the chairman of the emirate's Supreme Fiscal Committee, Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum. However, if necessary, Abu Dhabi would probably roll over the debt, to avoid any negative impact on market sentiment.

The emirate, which was on the brink of a default in 2009, borrowed US$20bn from its wealthier neighbour to shore up a troubled conglomerate, Dubai World, and others. The debt comprised US$10bn from the Central Bank of the UAE and US$5bn each from two state-owned banks, National Bank of Abu Dhabi and Al Hilal Bank. The US$10bn debt is due to mature in February and the bank debts in November 2014. In comments to reporters, Sheikh Ahmed also said that Dubai's state-linked companies were doing well and were able to meet their debt repayments.

Debt rises on improved sentiment

Dubai's debt, including that of government-related entities (GREs), has continued to rise since the global financial crisis. The IMF stated in June that the total debt of the emirate and its GREs rose by US$13bn between March 2012 and April 2013, to US$142bn. This is equivalent to 102% of the estimated 2012 GDP of Dubai and the UAE's poorer northern emirates. Of the estimated US$93bn owed by GREs, US$60bn will fall due between now and 2017, the Fund added.

The increase in GRE debt in 2012 and early 2013 reflects successful debt restructuring, the strengthening of the UAE economy and its property sector and ample global liquidity. These factors meant that Dubai GREs regained access to international credit markets and sought to take advantage of favourable borrowing conditions.

Fundamentals

Dubai's performance in 2014 will be pivotal to maintaining solid investor sentiment. Senior government officials have said consistently that the emirate will meet its debt obligations next year, buoyed by the UAE's wider economic recovery. The UAE is not well served with high-frequency economic indicators, but what indications there are regarding tourism, transport, the property sector, the stockmarket and company results point to considerable strength in the economy persisting in 2013. Ongoing support from high oil prices and the UAE's appeal as a safe-haven investment location in the region have bolstered the economy.

Rises in airport traffic and hotel occupancy contributed to a strong performance by the tourism industry in Dubai and Abu Dhabi in the first six months of the year. Tourist arrivals in Dubai rose by 11.1% year on year to more than 5.5m in the first half of 2013, helping to drive overall hotel occupancy to 84.6%. The city state's main airport handled 32.6m passengers during the period, marking an increase of 16.9% year on year. Furthermore, the property market in Dubai sparked back into life in 2012 and has continued to gain momentum in 2013. This has certainly benefited the finances of many GREs.

The main risks to this ongoing rebound include a shift down in oil prices and slowing global growth. We forecast that international oil prices will dip next year but will remain above US$100/barrel. On balance, we expect global GDP this year to expand by 2% at market exchange rates, down from global growth of 2.2% in 2012. However, we expect most of the currently suffering emerging markets to perform better in 2014, if only because the US, the EU and Japan are poised for faster growth. This should lead to a mild rebound in global GDP next year, to 2.7%.

More reforms needed

Dubai has been successful in restructuring GRE debt since the financial crisis, with most major agreements in place; a final deal regarding the debt of Dubai Holding is advanced but still pending. Progress with restructuring certainly boosted investor sentiment in 2012. Alongside this, the UAE is working on reforms to limit the risk of a renewed debt crisis.

The Central Bank has moved to curtail local banks' exposure to GREs, proposing that lenders should offer no more than 100% of their capital base to local governments and to state-linked entities. This law was announced in April 2012, and banks were told to be in compliance by the end of September last year. However, several banks—including leading UAE banks such as National Bank of Abu Dhabi, Emirates NBD, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and Noor Islamic Bank—said that they were unable to comply. The Central Bank has not yet managed to finalise this rule, but it announced in mid-September that an agreement had been reached with commercial banks and would be confirmed before the end of 2013.

The IMF has also stressed the importance of greater transparency with regard to the finances of GREs. The Fund acknowledged that the government had taken some steps towards better oversight. For example, the Dubai government has put in place a team to oversee debt issuance, and any new borrowing by GREs needs to be approved by the Supreme Fiscal Committee. Abu Dhabi, meanwhile, has improved its monitoring of GRE debt. Nevertheless, the IMF has urged a more comprehensive approach to transparency and the governance of GREs, stressing the importance of better data availability on debt and further reforms to improve corporate governance of GREs.

Roll over?

The finances of Dubai and the emirate's GREs have benefited from the economic rebound in 2012‑13. As a result, Dubai may now be in a position to repay its debts to neighbouring Abu Dhabi on schedule in 2014. However, any difficulties in meeting the due debt would play out behind closed doors, and Abu Dhabi would probably roll over the debt if necessary, to avoid any negative impact on market sentiment.

Tax grab or market regulation

29 September 2013

Dubai Land Department has announced that it will double the transfer fees on property sales, with just one week's notice of the change.

The fees will rise from 2 percent to 4 percent of the sale price for all properties, except the first direct sale from a developer to buyer, which will remain at 2 per cent.

The land department argues that the intent is to curb property flipping.

But if they were trying to control property flipping the higher tax would apply to properties sold on within for instance a few months of the previous purchase.

Instead this applies to all sales which makes it no more than a revenue grab to take advantage of the recovered property market.

By law, the property transfer fee is paid equally by both buyer and seller, but industry spokespeople say that in practice, the buyer usually ended up paying the full amount.

The increase to 4 percent means the charge on a AED2m home would double from AED40,000 to AED80,000.

The amount must be paid in full in cash to the Land Department and cannot be incorporated into a mortgage.

With more than $6bn worth of property and land transferred in the year to July, according to Dubai Land Department figures, the increased fees will see government coffers significantly enhanced.

One way to moderate speculation would be a scaled transfer fee. If you sell within the first year, its 5%, after 2 years it's 3%, after three years and thereafter it's 1%.....but this policy  penalizes all the longer term investors and owner-occupiers as well.

Cash grab. Let's just call it what it is and not pretend it is anything else.

Why the Y in Canada's airports?

25 September 2013

With thanks to www.theloop.ca

"When it comes to navigating Canadian airports, do you scratch your head and ask Y?

Unlike most airport codes that actually make sense – JFK (JFK), Boston (BOS), Miami (MIA), Sydney (SYD) Madrid (MAD) and Singapore (SIN) – Canadian airport codes begin with a Y. And just when you figure there's a pattern – YOW for Ottawa, YVR for Vancouver along comes Montreal (YUL), Edmonton (YEG) and Saskatoon (YXU). Not to mention the four U.S. airports that begin with their own Y, – tasty Yuma (YUM) for example and the anomalies that begin with a Z (ZBF for Bathurst, New Brunswick). Considering there are around 7,000 planes flying above North American skies each day, one would think there's a well-planned and logical explanation for all this. One would be wrong.

Every airport in the world has a 3-letter code that is maintained by the International Air Transport Association (IATA). There's also the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which uses 4-letter codes, tagging a C at the front of all Canadian airport codes, and a K for U.S. Airports. JFK becomes KJFK, YWG becomes CYWG, and KMART becomes a place you can still do your shopping. Airport codes evolved rather haphazardly as flying took off (ahem) in the 1930s. Flat fields with strong winds evolved into transportation hubs, places of work, and growing shopping malls. North America's first airports typically had just two letter codes, usually based on the weather station or radio transmitter where the strip was located. Aviation officials came up with the 3-letter code, figuring it unlikely that 17,576 airports would dot the world (the number of combinations allowed with 3 letters.) Airport codes were determined by weather stations, radio transmitters, cities, or in some cases, the name of the original fields in which they were located (for example Chicago's O'Hare Airport code is ORD, for Orchard Field).

Chicago’s ORD airport code is strange enough to Canada’s case to bring us back to the Y. Why the Y? Airport codes expanded into radio codes, and radio codes ultimately looped around, broke the internet and become airport codes again. Why isn't Toronto called YTO? Actually it is. YTO is the airline code for the entire region, with YTZ for Billy Bishop Airport, and YYZ the original radio transmitter code for a village called Malton, which is where Toronto Pearson International Airport is located today. Since Canada locked up the Y for its radio transmitters, it also locked up the Y for its airport codes. Tied into this somehow are radio stations. Did you know that all U.S. stations start with either a K or a W, depending on which side of the Mississippi they are? KWTF?

To offer a glimmer of hope, the International Air Transport Association assured us that “any new applying airport in Canada can suggest to be assigned any available code, they are not forced or even recommended to select a code with the letter Y.”"

Tales from Kai Tak

25 September 2013

Listen here.

A Radio Documentary about landing at the old Hong Kong Airport with contributions from pilots who flew this challenging approach on the IGS-13 making a sharp right at the checkerboard at 500ft over the Kowloon buildings with just seconds to line up and land on the runway often in treacherous weather conditions.

NOTE THIS IS AUDIO ONLY. Over 1000 hours production time went in this project which features three flight deck landing (one in a simulator training for an engine fire on take off. Contributors include captains David West, Dick Duxbury, Chip Crosby, Ralph Requa, Barry Schiff, Manny Puerta, Tom Erikson, Chip Crosby, Randy Sohn, Tim Olson, Jim Hancock, Nick Bristow, and from Hong Kong Airport GM Tony Norman. Produced by John MacCalman and first broadcast on Radio Clyde in 1998 with special thanks to British Airways, Northwest Airlines (now part of Delta), Cathay Pacific and the most excellent team at Hong Kong Air Traffic Control.

There really was nothing like it!

American gun use is out of control. Shouldn't the world intervene?

21 September 2013 The Observer

Last week, Starbucks asked its American customers to please not bring their guns into the coffee shop. This is part of the company's concern about customer safety and follows a ban in the summer on smoking within 25 feet of a coffee shop entrance and an earlier ruling about scalding hot coffee. After the celebrated Liebeck v McDonald's case in 1994, involving a woman who suffered third-degree burns to her thighs, Starbucks complies with the Specialty Coffee Association of America's recommendation that drinks should be served at a maximum temperature of 82C.

Although it was brave of Howard Schultz, the company's chief executive, to go even this far in a country where people are better armed and only slightly less nervy than rebel fighters in Syria, we should note that dealing with the risks of scalding and secondary smoke came well before addressing the problem of people who go armed to buy a latte. There can be no weirder order of priorities on this planet.

That's America, we say, as news of the latest massacre breaks – last week it was the slaughter of 12 people by Aaron Alexis at Washington DC's navy yard – and move on. But what if we no longer thought of this as just a problem for America and, instead, viewed it as an international humanitarian crisis – a quasi civil war, if you like, that calls for outside intervention? As citizens of the world, perhaps we should demand an end to the unimaginable suffering of victims and their families – the maiming and killing of children – just as America does in every new civil conflict around the globe.

The annual toll from firearms in the US is running at 32,000 deaths and climbing, even though the general crime rate is on a downward path (it is 40% lower than in 1980). If this perennial slaughter doesn't qualify for intercession by the UN and all relevant NGOs, it is hard to know what does.

To absorb the scale of the mayhem, it's worth trying to guess the death toll of all the wars in American history since the War of Independence began in 1775, and follow that by estimating the number killed by firearms in the US since the day that Edward Kennedy was shot in 1968 by a .22 Iver-Johnson handgun, wielded by Sirhan Sirhan. The figures from Congressional Research Service, plus recent statistics from icasualties.org, tell us that from the first casualties in the battle of Lexington to recent operations in Afghanistan, the toll is 1,171,177. By contrast, the number killed by firearms, including suicides, since 1968, according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI, is 1,384,171.

That 212,994 more Americans lost their lives from firearms in the last 45 years than in all wars involving the US is a staggering fact, particularly when you place it in the context of the safety-conscious, "secondary smoke" obsessions that characterise so much of American life.

Everywhere you look in America, people are trying to make life safer. On roads, for example, there has been a huge effort in the past 50 years to enforce speed limits, crack down on drink/drug driving and build safety features into highways, as well as vehicles. The result is a steadily improving record; by 2015, forecasters predict that for first time road deaths will be fewer than those caused by firearms (32,036 to 32,929).

Plainly, there's no equivalent effort in the area of privately owned firearms. Indeed, most politicians do everything they can to make the country less safe. Recently, a Democrat senator from Arkansas named Mark Pryor ran a TV ad against the gun-control campaign funded by NY mayor Michael Bloomberg – one of the few politicians to stand up to the NRA lobby – explaining why he was against enhanced background checks on gun owners yet was committed to "finding real solutions to violence".

About their own safety, Americans often have an unusual ability to hold two utterly opposed ideas in their heads simultaneously. That can only explain the past decade in which the fear of terror has cost the country hundreds of billions of dollars in wars, surveillance and intelligence programmes and homeland security. Ten years after 9/11, homeland security spending doubled to $69bn . The total bill since the attacks is more than $649bn.

One more figure. There have been fewer than 20 terror-related deaths on American soil since 9/11 and about 364,000 deaths caused by privately owned firearms. If any European nation had such a record and persisted in addressing only the first figure, while ignoring the second, you can bet your last pound that the State Department would be warning against travel to that country and no American would set foot in it without body armour.

But no nation sees itself as outsiders do. Half the country is sane and rational while the other half simply doesn't grasp the inconsistencies and historic lunacy of its position, which springs from the second amendment right to keep and bear arms, and is derived from English common law and our 1689 Bill of Rights. We dispensed with these rights long ago, but American gun owners cleave to them with the tenacity that previous generations fought to continue slavery. Astonishingly, when owning a gun is not about ludicrous macho fantasy, it is mostly seen as a matter of personal safety, like the airbag in the new Ford pick-up or avoiding secondary smoke, despite conclusive evidence that people become less safe as gun ownership rises.

Last week, I happened to be in New York for the 9/11 anniversary: it occurs to me now that the city that suffered most dreadfully in the attacks and has the greatest reason for jumpiness is also among the places where you find most sense on the gun issue in America. New Yorkers understand that fear breeds peril and, regardless of tragedies such as Sandy Hook and the DC naval yard, the NRA, the gun manufacturers, conservative-inclined politicians and parts of the media will continue to advocate a right, which, at base, is as archaic as a witch trial.

Talking to American friends, I always sense a kind of despair that the gun lobby is too powerful to challenge and that nothing will ever change. The same resignation was evident in President Obama's rather lifeless reaction to the Washington shooting last week. There is absolutely nothing he can do, which underscores the fact that America is in a jam and that international pressure may be one way of reducing the slaughter over the next generation. This has reached the point where it has ceased to be a domestic issue. The world cannot stand idly by.


Dordogne travel tips

21 September 2013

Do not even think about coming to this region without a car.

When you do bring your car also bring lots of changing; parking almost always requires a payment. And the machines only take coins. And there is never anyone or any machine to provide change.

Carrefour closes at 7.30pm in St-Cyprien and probably elsewhere as well. And byo bags.

French food can be depressingly over-rated. There are very few Michel Roux's.

Stick to red wine.

The French cannot cook pasta.

The reason the Dordogne is so green. It rains a lot.

Do not expect to get anywhere quickly.

Forget the balloons - Euro180 an hour per person. Ouch.

There is very little public access to the Dordogne River - unless you are living in a caravan.

The prettiest Dordogne villages have the largest and ugliest carparks. Truly eyesores.

Sarlat market, on Saturdays, seems to bring in everyone from miles around. Recommended. Though parking is a headache.

Brantome - severely over-rated. A large parking lot.

Domme - a nice town to take your mistress for lunch!

The french love roundabouts...they are everywhere.

Buying petrol/gas on a Sunday is a nightmare - even worse if you do not have a French credit card.

High unemployment is explained by stupid/pointless automation.

EK to Boston

19 September 2013

At long last Emirates has announced its newest USA route with a daily Dubai – Boston service to commence on 10th March 2014. The Boeing 777-200LR service will operate to the following schedule:

EK237 Dubai 0945 – Boston 1515
EK238 Boston 2255 – Dubai 1910+1

Boston will do well and will likely upgrade to a 77W before too long.

EK to Kabul

17 September 2013

Emirates crews will not be looking forward to the latest turnaround with the airline announcing that  it will commence a daily passenger service to Khwaja Rawash Airport, Kabul, Afghanistan from December 4.

Despite the obvious security concerns it is worth noting that flyDubai goes three times daily to Kabul and National Air has been operating passenger flights there for a year.

The route will be operated by an Airbus A340-500 configured in a three cabin configuration, offering 12 First Class, 42 Business Class and 204 Economy Class seats.

“Emirates has identified a demand for a premium service airline offering between Dubai and Kabul. With this new route Emirates will be able to offer passengers travelling to and from the city excellent global connections via Dubai, combined with the award-winning product and service the airline is renowned for. This includes operating the only First Class cabin between Dubai and Kabul”, said Barry Brown, Emirates’ divisional senior vice president, Commercial Operations East.

“We expect the flight to be particularly popular with corporate business travellers, as well as Afghan nationals returning home to visit friends and family. It will also present a new opportunity for cargo operations to the country, particularly for the shipment of pharmaceuticals, perishable foodstuffs and construction materials.”

EK 640 will depart Dubai daily at 09.55 hours and arrive in Kabul at 13.15. The return flight, EK 641 will leave Kabul at 15.30 hours and arrive back in Dubai at 18.00.

Welcome to the world of FZ pilots. Do your homework on this one, especially the approach for runway 11. For me its the most demanding of airports that we fly into. Terrain, weather, military VFR traffic everywhere. Good luck guys !


Recent transport disasters blamed on spirits

15 September - Khaosod online - and no this is not April 1st.

"Supernatural powers are cited as the factors behind recent high-profile accidents in Thailand, namely the botched landing of a Thai Airways plane at Bangkok′s main airport earlier this week.

14 people were injured during the evacuation from the Airbus A330-300 which skid off the runway of Suvarnabhumi Airport on 9 September.

While initial investigation pointed to a malfunctioned landing gear (the officials have not yet finished their inquiry), the Managing Director of Thai Aiways, Mr. Sorajak Kasemsuvan, is not taking chances. He said his company will conduct a major ceremony to appease the malevolent spirits said to be haunting the airport.

He is quoted as saying that the ceremony will also thank the said spirits for assisting with the successful operation to salvage the plane from the runway.

Mr. Sorajak′s comment followed a series of coverage by Thai Rath, the best-selling newspaper in Thailand, which gave extensive attention to the supposed involvement of ghosts and spirits in the accident.

Previously, Thai Rath has reported that a ghost in "traditional costume" (which strangely resembles the outfit Thai Airways flight attendants wear) has helped evacuate the passengers from the aircraft shortly after it slid off the runway.

The newspaper has also quoted Mr. Chotisak Asapaviriya, a former director of Airports Authority of Thailand (AOT), as saying that he had organised a regular prayer session to placate the vengeful spirits which reside in the airport vicinity.

At the ceremony to unveil the airport in 2006, Mr. Chotisak told Thai Rath, an official in charge of searching for explosive materials had broken down into a trance, claiming that he was being possessed by a "grandfather ghost" who demanded a shrine to be built on the airport compound. The shrine was quickly built afterwards.

Thai Rath helpfully points out that 8 major shrines have been built around Suvarnabhumi Airport by the staff in order to ward off evil spirits, such as a shrine dedicated to the Naga (holy big snake in Buddhist myths) which is presumably angered by construction of the airport on what was once a swamp inhabited by snakes.

Other smaller shrines include a strangely named "Italian Shrine".

The newspaper cited the curses of the residing ghosts as the main reason the construction of the airport had been delayed for decades. The more rational Thais, however, would point to mire of corruption that has plagued the project before the government of Thaksin Shinawatra finalised the project in late 2005.

Dr. Smith Thammasaroj, former director of Suvarnnabhumi Airport, told Thai Rath he was convinced of the existence of supernatural entities around the airport even though, he admitted, he had never encountered any particular case personally.

The scientist who once headed Thailand′s Meteorological Department said he had invited so many psychics to conduct ceremonies and constructed so many shrines "that I can′t keep count".

"We even had to build a condominium for the ghosts to reside," Dr. Smith said, "Because the spirits are so many individual spirit houses won′t be enough".

However, there has been few secular responses to the accident at Suvarnabhumi Airport on 9 September, too. Sqn.Ldr. Sitha Tiwaree, Managing Director AOT, said the authority has conducted an Emergency Plan Rehearsal, in which the airport′s fire and rescue departments took part.

The accident involving the Airbus was the most severe case at the airport since its opening 7 years ago, he said.

Sqn.Ldr. Sitha stressed that the incident will be analysed for future adjustment of the Emergency Plan, particularly how to transport passengers to the airport building - the procedure that received several complaints on 9 September. The rehearsal also pointed out that the airline crew was not familiar with the runway, causing complications during the latest accident, the director noted.

In long term, he said, the airport plans to build another substitute runway, in order to sustain further service. The AOT board will meet on Tuesday, 17 September to discuss about the construction budget, according to Sqn.Ldr. Sitha.

But it seems the spirits do not only roam the sky.

After a train headed from Malaysia to Bangkok′s Hua Lamphong Station derailed in the capital city yesterday, Daily News, the second best selling newspaper of the kingdom, reported that a certain curse might be involved.

According to Daily News, a painting at Hua Lamphong depicted a small obstacle in the rail track, which perfectly explains the frequent derailments - more than 15 incidents this year alone.

Even Transport Minister Chatchart Sitthipan, best known for his hands-on approach in inspecting problems of public transports, is mulling a paranormal hands-on solution. He has reportedly ordered the Deputy Permanent Secretary of the Ministry to consider a plan to organise a merit-making ceremony for the sake of his Ministry.

During the past few months, Mr. Chatchart noted, the country has suffered from many transport accidents such as minivan crashes, train derailments, boat crashes, and the Thai Airways incident.

"There have been more deaths than usual. Many have suggested that the Ministry of Transport needs a large-scale merit-making ceremony" Mr. Chatchart said."


How to hire

15 September 2013

The following is quoted this month from the CEO of the most profitable airline in history, Southwest Airlines. It is not rocket science. But SWA's success is built by leaders that have left their ego's at the door; this will not happen in the ME.

Copied from their inflight magazine:

"Our People formula is pretty simple: We hire for attitude and train for skill. Fortunately, because of our Brand rankings, great pay and benefits, history of no layoffs or furloughs, and our world-famous Culture, a lot of great folks want to work at Southwest. This means our pool of potential Employees is chock-full of the best and brightest. In fact, last year we received 114,845 résumés and only hired 2,499 candidates. (A person has a better chance of getting into an Ivy League university than getting hired at Southwest.) We take great pride in hiring the right People and spend a lot of energy on doing so.

Once onboard, we don’t focus intensely on rules or policy applications, except those related to Safety. Instead, we give our Employees the Freedom to be themselves, to do the right thing, and to take care of our Customers. But we do have one rule that overrides all others, and that is The Golden Rule—treating others as you wish to be treated. We’ve found over our 42-year history that if we hire People with passionate Servant’s Hearts and empower them to do what’s right, they will consistently surprise, delight, and amaze our Customers.

By building a Company that is People-centric, we have built the most successful and profitable airline with the best Customer Service in the history of commercial aviation. Thanks for coming along for the ride!

Gary Kelly - Chairman, President, and CEO"

Faye Wong announces second divorce

14 September 2013

I was saddened to read that the wonderfully talented singer Faye Wong has announced that she has divorced her second husband, Li Yapeng.

The disclosure on her Weibo page was reposted more than 70,000 times and attracted almost 30,000 comments from her shocked fans within half an hour.

"Our affinity and connection as a husband and wife in this life has come to an end," she wrote on the mainland's Twitter-like social media platform at around 7.30pm. "I'm well. Please take care of yourself as well."

Now based in Beijing Faye Wong had married mainlander and former actor Li in 2005.

In a posting on his Weibo page later, Li, who is two years Wong's junior, admitted that they had broken up.

Li confirmed the split in his own microblog at 8:07pm, saying: "I need a family, but you are destined to be a legend. I miss all the best times of the past decade. I still love you as I have always been, but I'm sorry that letting it go is the only thing I can do now" implying that the two divorced because of a difference of values.

He said their daughter would be taken into his custody and that there would not be any disputes over money because the pair had remained independent in their financial affairs.

State-owned CCTV also put the news on its Weibo page. Citing an anonymous source said to be close to Li, it said the couple had signed a divorce agreement in Urumqi , Xinjiang , where Li was born, and that he was on his way back to Beijing.

In 2006 the couple had successfully set up the Smile Angel Foundation, a charity for Chinese children with cleft palates, after their daughter Li Yan was born with a severe cleft lip.

They hosted their first charity gala dinner for the foundation in Hong Kong in May. The event, held on Li Yan's birthday, raised a total of about HK$56 million including funds from the record-breaking sale of a painting by contemporary artist Zeng Fanzhi for HK$30 million. A panda painting by their daughter fetched HK$1 million.

Wong married her first husband, musician Dou Wei, in 1996 and divorced three years later. They had a daughter, who lives with Wong.


Lies, damned lies and house price statistics

14 September 2013

Arabian Business has been on the happy pills again reporting that Dubai house prices have surged 21.7 percent year-on-year in the last twelve months, according to the latest figures by London-based real estate firm Knight Frank.

It all depends where you start from.

Arabian Business adds that Dubai leads the annual rankings as the emirate’s housing market has gained momentum since late 2012.

Real estate agents say residents are increasingly looking to buy their own property as they cash in on an “under-priced” market while shunning rising rents.

An analysis of the Land Department data by Arabian Business showed property sales totalled $6.26bn between January and the end of July this year, up from $3.74bn for the same period last year.

For real estate sales, the data pointed to the number of transactions increasing from 1922, or 275 a month, last year to 3012, or 430 a month this year.

Here is the problem.

Say your value at the start is 100. You then lose 60% so that your value is just 40. You then gain 22% and your value increases to 49. Guess what. Your property is still worth only 50% of what it was at the start.

So all this rooftop shouting about Dubai's turnaround and its world leading increase in property values needs to take account of just how awful the fall was before the slow recovery began.

Get stuck in again

13 September 2013 The Economist

Saudi rulers are once again trying to exert their influence in the region

"As the world’s richest family, the House of Saud has a geopolitical wish-list that has—of late—been strikingly short. Its main aim is to thwart the ambitions of Iran, a Shia Muslim republic that has for three decades been the Sunni Muslim kingdom’s stubborn rival for regional influence. And the Saudis want their fellow Arabs to settle down quietly and stop all this talk of democracy and revolution.

The infectious mood of the Arab spring, along with Iran’s extension of influence into troubled Iraq and Syria, has challenged both those policies in recent years. Revolutionary turmoil in the region not only revealed that many Arabs view autocracy in general, let alone Saudi-style absolute monarchy, with disfavour. It pushed close friends of the kingdom, such as Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, out of power, while boosting the fortunes of the Muslim Brotherhood, a group whose pretensions to Sunni leadership, tentacular reach and secrecy have long stirred deep Saudi suspicions. Iran’s massive commitment of money, men and materiel to bolster Bashar Assad in Syria has meanwhile outweighed Saudi Arabia’s hesitant backing for bickering rebel groups. Worse yet, the Sauds’ oldest and strongest ally, America, looked ever more keen to abdicate its regional role.

Yet things may be tilting nicely back in the Saudis’ favour. Post-uprising messes in Bahrain, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen have all served to dampen the general enthusiasm for revolution. The toppling of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muhammad Morsi as Egypt’s president in July was especially gratifying. Egypt’s generals, many with close ties to the Saudis, are back at the helm. Qatar, the small but punchy Gulf emirate that had annoyingly backed the Brothers, has been put back in its box. And for now at least, Mr Mubarak is out of prison. Small wonder the kingdom is showering Egypt with aid, and loudly voices diplomatic support in the face of criticism for the new regime’s ruthless suppression of its opponents.

Events in Syria may have also begun, in Saudi eyes, to unfold their way. Saudi-supplied arms, which began to flow in earnest only earlier this year, are grinding down Mr Assad’s war machine, encouraging rebels on the southern front to push closer to Damascus. The chemical attack on rebel-held suburbs of Damascus on August 21st may have helped the Saudi cause still more. After months of quiet Saudi lobbying in Washington for a tougher American line, Mr Obama is being prodded—albeit hobbled by his foes in Congress and the UN Security Council—into taking drastic action. The Saudis still hope that Mr Assad’s forces will be clobbered by American cruise missiles before too long.

The turnaround has been particularly satisfying for Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who served for two decades as ambassador to America but now runs Saudi intelligence. Back in the old days, he played a quiet but crucial role in America’s covert cold-war forays, providing funds, when the CIA could not, to Afghan mujahideen, Nicaraguan Contras and the Iraqi army then fighting Iran. Especially if Mr Obama gets his way and gives Mr Assad’s regime a drubbing, the Saudis will be hoping that the good times will roll again."


Divine intervention saves passengers!

13 July 2013

This is one of those only in Thailand stories.

Remember the Thai Airways A330 landing accident from a few days ago - the hasty paint job and some highly questionable customer service. All that led to some appalling PR for the airline.

How do you deflect that PR. You create a fantastical ghost story.

The Bangkok Post reports today that "public curiosity has been stoked by a passenger's account suggesting divine intervention aided the emergency operation."

Apparently a passenger has claimed on a radio programme to have spotted a woman thought to be a cabin crew member in a traditional outfit helping evacuate people from the A330-300 aircraft, which veered off the runway on Sunday night after arriving from China.

A traditional outfit is worn by female cabin crew during flight, but they typically switch to the airline's skirt and blouse uniform before landing. A THAI source said the passenger's story has bewildered airline executives and crew, particularly those on board Flight 679.

Bewildering Thai Air executives is not difficult at the moment.

The crew insisted none among them were wearing the traditional outfit when the accident took place. The source said the passenger may have seen a guardian angel who "stepped in" to help. Oh please. How about simply saying that the passenger was delusional.

To make matters worse an Airports of Thailand (AoT) source said some airport fire brigade and emergency response personnel claimed to have seen a woman in traditional dress shuffling into and out of their office, causing crackling in their radio transmissions.

And these people are entrusted with saving our lives in the event of an accident.

The AoT source said Suvarnabhumi has seven spirit houses at the airport to ward off ill fortune....clearly not very successfully. The first one is Sarn Thepparak, erected before the airport was inaugurated in 2006.

AoT former president Chotesak Artpawiriya said technical glitches and accidents at the airport persisted despite the presence of the spirit house. He later ordered six more to be constructed. After all that would be cheaper than repairing the taxiways and runways!

Khun Cotesak said that he recalled an incident in which a bomb disposal expert at the airport exhibited signs of being possessed by a deity. The man said he was a wandering spirit called Phor Kae Ming who needed a home.

The last spirit house was constructed to be its dwelling place.

Now lets get on with investigating what really happened.

TV's golden age

11 September 2013

Are we in a TV golden age?

The answer is a qualified yes. At least in terms of TV drama. As a medium television is attracting some of the brightest and best directing talent.

The ensemble tv dramas really become prominent in the 1970s not with Dallas and Dynasty but with the grittiness of shows like Hill Street Blues.

The 1980s brought us Northern Exposure - a magical mix of drama and whimsy.

But there were only a handful of shows that anyone wanted to watch on a handful of networks.

Now we have independent networks producing major dramas for Showtime, HBO, Netflix, AMC. These shows can be watched week to week or increasingly are packaged as box sets. You can do so much more to develop plots and personalities over 10 to 20 hours of television that in a 100 minute film.

My must watch list at the moment includes Person of Interest, Homeland, The Good Wife, True Blood.

Season 3 of Person of Interest is scheduled to premiere Tuesday, Sept. 24 at 10 p.m. on CBS

Homeland Series 3 will debut on Showtime in the US on 29 September

The Good Wife Season 5 kicks off on September 29 also on CBS.

AMC produces the hugely successful Breaking Bad and Mad Men.

Others that I watch from time to time include House of Cards, House of Lies, Suits, Dexter and sometimes even The Mentalist.

I have not seen Game of Thrones but I probably should.

Meanwhile the British brought us Luther - wonderful tv.

And there is of course the hugely popular soap opera Downton Abbey with season four begining on Sunday 22 September.

But we are also moving to binge TV - watching multiple episodes back to back - online or as a boxed set. That does not work so well for the traditional major networks who still like to test a market with pilot episodes. House of Cards for instance was released online to Netflix subscribers.

TV is changing - but its drama output may be better than ever.

 

 

 

Lessons in crisis management

10 September 2013

Fourteen passengers were injured on Sunday night/Monday morning after a Thai Airways service, TG 679, from Guangzhou, China, skidded off the runway at Suvarnabhumi airport in Bangkok. Early reports suggest the landing gear on the Airbus A330-300 malfunctioned.

The plane veered off the runway, came to a halt and the captain ordered an emergency evacuation. It is likely that most of the injuries among the 288 passengers came as passengers left the airliner.

There are many lessons emerging from this incident.

Traditional and social media have focused on the fact that within hours of the incident maintenance crews were spraying black paint over the airline logos. However, the distinctive colour scheme of the airline remained clearly visible.

The good news is that the crash was not more serious. The pilots and cabin crew appear to have done an effective job in halting and evacuating the airplane.

But type Thai Airways into google news and the story is all about hiding the logo and not about the wellbeing of the passengers and the actions of the crew and airport safety teams.

Thai Airways official Smud Poom-On said that the "blurring the logo" after the accident was a recommendation from Star Alliance - a global group of 29 airline partners - known as the "crisis communication rule". He added that "it is meant to protect the image of both the airline and other members of Star Alliance.”

The trouble with that explanation is that it does not seem to be correct. A Star Alliance spokesman has pointed out that it does not require this logo-covering. "The [Thai Airways] official is misinformed," he said. Thai had its story sorted out by Monday afternoon, though, and issued an official statement to clarify that "de-identifying an aircraft after an incident" is the company's policy, and not that of Star Alliance.

Rather an outdated policy - and one that has unfortunately earned Thai Airways huge ridicule in the media. After all, plenty of images are available of the crippled plane before the black paint job was applied to its logos. And it's hardly a secret that this is a Thai Airways service. Perhaps it just seems less embarrassing this way.

The AWSJ covered this in more detail quoting John Bailey, the managing director of Icon International, a communications firm that also advises airlines on crisis management. “It is now not considered best practice in the airline community to do this,” he said.

Bailey pointed out that passengers and airport visitors commonly have smartphones with cameras, marking quite a different world than two decades ago when airlines commonly masked their logos on damaged planes.

“The environment has changed, and the challenge for airlines is infinitely more complicated. If an accident happens in a visible and populated area, the airline can’t hope to match the speed of response of eyewitnesses and survivors,” said Mr. Bailey, who previously worked with the International Air Transport Association.

Andrew Herdman, the director general of Association of Asia Pacific Airlines (AAPA) said it was up to the airlines to make a decision.

“Historically, some airlines have had a policy of masking the airline logo following an accident rather than have the beleaguered aircraft advertise their corporate misfortune so graphically. However, in the modern era of social media and instantaneous sharing of images, this obviously is of limited effectiveness,” Mr. Herdman said in an emailed response to a query from The Wall Street Journal.

The International Air Transport Association, the industry’s trade group, released a document on best practices on crisis communication after a conference last year that discussed the role of social media such as Twitter and Facebook in the November 2010 engine failure of a Qantas Airways Ltd. Airbus A380 superjumbo jet over Batam island in Indonesia.

The IATA document advised airlines to be “proactive” in their communication and put out facts as quickly as possible because, with passengers and eyewitnesses firing posts on social media, they don’t have a lot of time to gather information before issuing a formal statement.

The communications chief of another airline, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said logo masking doesn’t go over well with today’s more savvy, Internet-empowered public. The public expects more transparency and responsibility, he said.

“It [logo masking] used to be standard practice to prevent damage to reputation, but the world’s a different place now and most crisis management people believe you’d be sending the wrong message to the public if you paint over,” the airline spokesperson said.

However, many airlines continue with such paint jobs. Most recently an Alitalia S.p.A. ATR-72 turboprop plane that veered off the runway in Rome in February 2013 was covered in white paint.

The logo story has obscured other issues arising from the incident which led to about 40 passengers complaining of poor treatment by ground staff to THAI president Sorajak Kasemsuvan.

The comments from passengers suggest that Thai Airways responded slowly and poorly to the Sunday night incident.

The complaints included:

1. No one from the airline had informed them of how the company would reimburse their medical fees.

2. A lack of communication immediately after the accident, with passengers saying they were left abandoned.

3. There were no interpreters to inform passengers of the situation. Many of the passengers were Chinese tourists.

4. Passengers were marshalled to shuttle buses but the buses remained stationary with passengers locked inside unattended for 20 minutes. Some in shock. Some needing first aid.

5. Passengers were taken from the accident scene to immigration counters, but some of the passengers had left the aircraft without their passports, causing confusion.

6. At the terminal, no staff members were there to receive passengers. There was not even a glass of water to drink.

Former Bangkok governor candidate Kosit Suvinitjit was travelling in business class on the flight; Mr Kosit praised the efforts of the pilots and cabin crew, saying they controlled the situation well. He also thanked the airport's emergency response staff, including firefighters, for reaching the stricken aircraft swiftly.

What the airline needed to do was focus on the well-being of its passengers and crew; praise their efforts and those of the emergency teams and ATC; and worry less about covering up the fact that they had pranged one of their airplanes.

Lessons that will hopefully be learned.

Kanpai Tokyo!

10 September 2013

So it is Tokyo 2020.

The city fended off not-especially-stiff competition from Madrid, whose chances were damaged by Spain’s sickly economy, and Istanbul, whose image was tarnished when its police spent the summer practising for the 100-metre baton-charge.

It was not the strongest field of candidate cities in Olympic history. But the contest demonstrated the lengths that countries will go to for the privilege of hosting the world’s biggest sporting bash.

All three country's Prime Ministers were in attendance in Buenos Aires, where the International Olympic Committee (IOC) was voting, to make the official case for their respective countries.

Tokyo had previously bid unsuccessfully for the 2016 games; Madrid had bid for both 2016 and 2012. Poor Istanbul has now been rejected five times. Why are cities so keen to host the Olympics?

On the face of it, throwing the world’s biggest party—and paying for it—is not especially appealing. The cost used to be fairly modest: London’s 1948 Olympics cost £732,268, or about £20m ($30m) in today’s money. Nowadays hosting the games is a different business. The 2008 Beijing games, the priciest ever, are reckoned to have cost about $40 billion. That is likely to be eclipsed next year by the Sochi winter games, which are on course to cost $50 billion. Tourism may help to offset the expense, but a spike in arrivals is not guaranteed especially in Sochi!

Beijing saw a drop in hotel bookings during its Olympic summer. And the chance to spruce up a city sometimes ends up creating eyesores instead. Some of Greece’s costly stadiums now look as run-down as the Parthenon (and have fewer visitors).

The main reason cities want to host the Olympics is that, perhaps against the odds, they are wildly popular with the voters who foot the bill. The IOC found that public support for hosting the games was around 70% in Tokyo, 76% in Madrid and 83% in Istanbul.

Londoners, sometimes a cynical bunch, were in favour of the 2012 games. At the end of last year, with the crowds departed, eight out of ten said it was worth the extraordinary cost, even as cuts to public services began to bite.

Popularity aside, Olympic bids often have other agendas. The Beijing games were intended to show off China’s spending and organisational power. London’s games were a means of bringing back to life a poor part of the capital at a speed that defied normal budgets and planning regulations. Tokyo hopes the 2020 games can gee up Japan’s lacklustre economy.

It is a high-risk game. Rio’s hosting of the 2016 games had strong local support during the bidding process, but has since become a focus of those protesting against government waste (they also rage against the World Cup, which Brazil will host next year). Politicians can be left looking ridiculous, or worse: Mexico’s 1968 Olympics are remembered as much for the massacre of student protesters ten days before the games as for the sporting events themselves.

Even if it goes well, the seven-year gap between bidding for the games and staging them means that the politicians who shepherd the bid through are seldom around when the fun begins. The Labour government and Labour mayor of London who helped to win the bid for Britain were long gone by 2012. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is no longer Brazil’s president (though some wonder if he might just try to make a comeback). Shinzo Abe faces no term limits as Japan’s prime minister, so could, in theory, still be around to open the Tokyo games in 2020. More likely, though, someone else will be there to take the credit—or the blame.

2020 will be spectacular, efficient and popular. Will it bring a lasting legacy? Unlikely. It might be a good time to leave town for a month but for those who stay Tokyo will have a party.

The 2020 Olympic vote

7 September 2020

Olympic officials in Buenos Aires will vote on Saturday to determine who will host the 2020 Games on 7 September 2013.

The three candidate cities are Madrid, Tokyo and Istanbul.

Spanish authorities have already started spending billions of dollars on the construction of 35 projects including the main stadium, which will become the new home of Athletico Madrid.

Tokyo had the Olympics in 1964; Barcelona in 1992. Istanbul never. Spain is bankrupt; Tokyo is difficult for the big money broadcasters from the USA and Europe. It is also hard to gauge whether the city truly backs this bid; Istanbul’s bid was setback by the harsh response to antigovernment protests there in June. 

Though the protests have subsided, they have left the I.O.C. delegates to contemplate seven years ahead of time what Turkey’s political situation might be in 2020.

Add to this the regional uncertainty of war in neighboring Syria and a possible military intervention there by the United States; a doping scandal that ensnared more than 30 track and field athletes in Turkey; possible transportation shortcomings; and spectator indifference to the recent under-20 world soccer championships in Turkey.

Maybe that is a long enough list to rule out Istanbul.

One thing is for sure - the lessons from all previous Olympics is that building and hosting costs will be far greater than budgeted and that the idea of an Olympic legacy is very short-lived. The feel good factor that the UK enjoyed lasted no more than a few weeks; budget cuts have decimated sports programmes and the Olympic stadium is being handed over to West Ham United (hardly a glamour club other than to the East End faithful) for a basement rental.

So who will it be. I would like Istanbul; they have bid for five Olympics now and must deserve an opportunity.

Tokyo would be a good choice as well....everything will be on time and wonderfully efficient. And it is likely that the IOC would like a safe choice given the continuing construction, budget and unrest issues in Brazil (the 2016 host).

Madrid...it may just be the favorite; it also bid for 2012 and 2016; but Spain's war chest is not on the scale of Japan's.

So 100 delegate will vote. And there is no clear favorite.

My guess - the IOC will still take a risk - and award the games to Istanbul.

Re-read this in one year

3 September 2013

The Gulf News published the following editorial on 1 September 2013. It is as though the deaths of over one thousand Egyptian civilians on August 14th never happened. The editorial concludes that " Egypt is on its way to recovery and prosperity." There is no mention of those who died; no mention of the continuing unrest and the curfew that remains in place. No hint of the possibility of civil war.

There is a lull in activity in Egypt. It may be that Syria is taking priority in the news. Meanwhile Egypt’s chief prosecutor has ordered former president Mohamed Morsi and other Muslim Brotherhood leaders on Sunday to stand trial on charges including inciting murder, the state news media reported. This order could extinguish hope of any political resolution that would bring the Brotherhood out from underground and back into the political process.

The Gulf News states the official UAE position and we can all hope for a peaceful resolution of the Egyptian conflict. But recovery and prosperity look a dream rather than reality at this time.

"UAE reiterates its support for Egypt - Editorial - Gulf News

"During the turbulent months of Muslim Brotherhood rule in Egypt, which ended early July, relations between the UAE and the largest Arab country soured. The Brotherhood movement thought that by dominating Egypt, it could secure similar dominance and spread its influence in other Arab states using a complicated network of followers and so-called charities that pay allegiance to the movement’s Supreme Guide.

The UAE and other Gulf states confronted those plans. They conveyed their message repeatedly to former Egypt president Mohammad Mursi’s government that they will not accept interference in their internal affairs and will not tolerate such transgression by cross-border movements. The Brotherhood, known for its arrogance, ignored those friendly messages and displayed hostility towards most Gulf governments. On July 3, the Mursi government was dissolved by the army following three days of popular anti-Brotherhood protests.

Since then, relations between Egypt and the UAE have been repaired. Ties between the two countries have always been strong. The hundreds of thousands of Egyptians living in this country always considered the UAE as their home country and Emiratis, inspired by the love Shaikh Zayed had for Egypt, always considered that country a strategic partner.

In this context, the visit to Egypt by General Shaikh Mohammad Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, the highest ranking Gulf official to visit Egypt since the formation of the new government, comes as proof that ties are back to their traditional strength. It is also a clear message to the Egyptian people that the UAE, along with other Gulf states, will firmly stand by them at this critical juncture in their country’s history.

The West has been threatening Egypt with aid cuts since the overthrow of Mursi’s government. Shaikh Mohammad’s visit and the strong statement by Saudi Arabia on the aid issue last week show that Egypt is on its way to recovery and prosperity."

The Syrian question

1 September 2013

The Syrian conflict is now in its third year. The battle lines are between the Assad regime and anti-government rebels, mostly from the disparate Free Syrian Army. The fighting has spilled periodically across Syria's borders with Lebanon, Iraq and Turkey, threatening to engulf the region. It has made almost two million refugees and last month the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon said it has claimed more than 100,000 lives.

The west sits outside the conflict. It is likely that western nations are trying to bring down the Assad regime; that there is logistical support for the Free Syrian Army. But the Syrian regime has a staunch ally in the Russians; and the Chinese sit happily on the fence. Which leaves it to the USA, Britain and France to determine what, if any, military action they will take.

Evidence of the use of chemical weapons has stepped up calls for western intervention. On Thursday in the UK, MPs debated military intervention, with Prime Minister David Cameron claiming evidence suggests President Assad did use chemical weapons against his own people. Cameron's motion for possible military action was defeated by 285-272, with a strong rebellion by his own MPs and some ministers.

In the USA Obama has back-tracked and says that he will now seek a vote of approval in Congress before he authorises any military action. That vote cannot be held until after September 9th.

Meanwhile Vladimir Putin has dismissed as "utter nonsense" America's claim that the Syrian regime used chemical weapons against its own people. Not unreasonably Putin also called on the Obama administration to present the evidence behind its claims to the UN Security Council. Although maybe Putin should simply watch the BBC. Seems the broadcaster may be providing more reliable information than Russian intelligence.

Syria 21 August attack: Frank Gardner on what we know.

The US Secretary of State, John Kerry, accused pro-Assad forces of killing 1,429 people - including 426 children - with chemical weapons in a Damascus suburb on 21 August. He called the attack an "inconceivable horror".

Pushed beyond his infamous red line President Barack Obama said the US was now considering a "limited narrow act," based on the intelligence.

The Assad regime said the Kerry statement was "full of lies", claiming opposition fighters launched the attack.

After a week of debate Obama has now said that he will seek congressional authorisation for military intervention in Syria.

The reality appears to be that we simply do not want to get involved. The British Parliament clearly reflected public sentiment. Indeed it is possible to be proud of a parliament that said no to the executive on a matter like military action.

But was it the right decision. Or is it rather a shameful hiding from responsibility.

Why the no vote in Britain? The leftover poisons of the Iraq war; the toxic effect of public distrust in our politics. Mishandling by the government that did not have the support it needed. A Labour opposition that used its parliamentary duty to ask questions as an excuse to avoid making decisions. These are reasons why we are where we are. But they are not excuses.

Britain is side-lined. The French may be America's new best friend. As once leaders in international law and engagement Britain continues to move to growing isolationism.

The bottom line is this. Parliament was asked to join an international coalition led by a US Democrat president, whose aim, a firm response to a flagrant breach of international law, was supported by most European nations and many Middle Eastern ones. And parliament said no.

But if that is the line to be taken then why does Britain need the world's fourth most expensive defence forces?

But here is the problem - Parliament needed overwhelming, verified, proof. It did not get that. Cameron released a three-page assessment of the Joint Intelligence Committee which said it was "highly likely" the Assad regime launched the chemical weapons attack. But the document failed to ascribe a motive to the regime for the attack.

Downing Street also released a government summary of the legal advice by the attorney general, Dominic Grieve, which said military action would be lawful "under the doctrine of humanitarian intervention". Opening the debate in a packed Commons, the prime minister said the attorney general had delivered a clear judgment. But he acknowledged that the intelligence agencies had not delivered a definitive verdict.

Philippe Sands, a leading expert in international law, said the document failed to provide a "sound or persuasive legal argument" in favour of military action.

Cheryl Gillan, a former Wales secretary under Cameron, said: "I do not have enough accurate or verifiable information to support direct UK military action in Syria." Recalling the vote on Iraq, she said she was cautious because she "cannot sit in this House and be duped again".

But Bernard Jenkin, the chairman of the commons public administration committee, called on the House of Commons to stop "post-Iraq panic paralysing the country".

With hundreds killed with conventional weapons each week in Syria why are chemical weapons different? Why should the west respond to one type of killing when it took no military action to prevent the deaths of an estimated 100,000 Syrians by more conventional but often brutal methods.

“Chemical weapons are genuinely horrible, and they are indiscriminate,” said Jeffrey Lewis, an arms-control expert at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “They are a particularly cruel way to kill someone.”

It is true that civilians will die in any conflict — often in excruciating ways. But maybe it is right to draw a line and ban the most inhumane weapons, the things that kill on a mass scale. Disclosure; my grandfather was one of the long term sufferers from poison gas in World War One.

Last Saturday, Obama evoked images of gassed Syrian children.

“What message will we send if a dictator can gas hundreds of children to death in plain sight and pay no price?” the president said. “What’s the purpose of the international system that we’ve built if a prohibition on the use of chemical weapons that has been agreed to by the governments of 98 percent of the world’s people and approved overwhelmingly by the Congress of the United States is not enforced?”

It sounds obscene but even war needs to be regulated by a widely shared principle on acceptable conduct. The trouble is that smells of hypocrisy from the US - think napalm in Vietnam.

So where are we?

In a looping debate. Words and not actions. In the UK the people have spoken. The USA looks almost as isolated as Syria. The tragedy is that there are people dieing as you read this and no clear way to stop it. Assad has to go. But he has great longevity and powerful allies.